Reading
Gray and Esposito’s essays against each other brings out some obvious
differences. While Esposito stresses the importance of narrative or content to
popular discourse on affirmative action and diversity, Gray’s industrial analysis
forgoes attaching any significance to the content of black-oriented TV
programming, except to say that celebrities like Oprah and Bill Cosby modelled
a profitable, urbane blackness that could be widely marketed t American audiences.
Esposito also mentions Oprah, a TV star even I grew up knowing and admiring
from India as an example of the pull-yourself-up-by-the-bootstraps narrative
that she seemed to be not only embedded in but also to promote. Gray’s analysis
is critical of an over-reliance on textual analysis to explain a sudden rise in
the popularity of certain shows, arguing instead that the 80s boom was driven
by dwindling advertising profits and a realisation that “African-American audiences
were a ready-made, already-organized and exploitable market niche” (67). However,
he also credits a symbiosis between industrial arms of the TV and mass media
market – radio, films, talent agencies, etc, that necessitated a fresh outlook.
However,
this argument skips over the structural inequalities and explicit racism of
these “symbiotic” associations. Why should competition force American TV to be
more racially diverse when competition has always existed? Perhaps a link needs
to be drawn between these capitalistic pressures and the kind of black respectability
modelled by Oprah and Bill Cosby. Cosby, especially, has been strident and
admonitory about black youth, saying at an event in 2004 ““These people marched and were hit in the face
with rocks to get an education, and now we have these knuckleheads running
around,” he said of what he perceived as young people disrespecting the legacy
of civil rights activists. “I can’t even talk the way these people talk: ‘Why
you ain’t,’ ‘Where you is’ ... and I blamed the kid until I heard the mother
talk. And then I heard the father talk. ... Everybody knows it’s important to
speak English except these knuckleheads. You can’t be a doctor with that kind
of crap coming out of your mouth…Are you not paying attention, people with
their hat on backwards, pants down the crack?” He attacks AAVE, hip-hop
culture, black fashion, everything that he perceives as ruining black
respectability.
Oprah’s rags-to-riches story creates the same affective imperative –
black people, and other POC are responsible for their failure to achieve the American
dream. I think I wouldn’t say Gray is incorrect in looking at industry
practices, but one also needs to focus on the qualitative aspects of blackness
on TV, and its mainstream acceptability in America. Esposito’s Ugly Betty
analysis is on point, but Betty and Marc’s dynamic needs to be seen against a
backdrop of highly-publicised black success stories that are celebrated by
stressing their lack of reliance on the state, their cultural white-washing and
overall assimilation into white meritocracy.
Laboni, I think this is a sharp analysis, one that gets at the heart of why strict industrial analysis can go awry. Particularly, Gray's method is seemingly unable to integrate (positive or negative) feedback loops, in which the financial success of liberal-bourgeois-meritocratic images might lead to a doubling down on the profitability of upper-middle-class blackness OR the increased isolation and tokenization of those televisual figureheads representing that ideological conceit. I'm reminded of some of the network commercials we screened last semester in TV history, in which the images of Cliff Huxtable and Steve Urkel represented the kind of blackness that the 'average' American viewer would feel comfortable inviting into their home via electric hearth.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteYes, well put Laboni and as Skyler mentions gets at some of the drawbacks of a merely textual or industrial analysis. A key strain lacking from both analyses beyond a sense of the "meritocratic" images of blackness or those of middle class respectability for me concerns the ways in which neoliberal ideals entwine at the level of the economic and the identitarian. Sure, Fox and NBC et al might have been able to produce images of blackness at a lower risk within a narrowcasting model of TV, but these also map back onto an increasing focus on the individual in a political sense - "their lack of reliance on the state," as you put it. I'm curious to discuss these differences and the role of the "individual" specifically within the frame of Black-ish today and the "I Have A Dream" storyline of black exceptionalism within the predominantly white space of the private high school.
ReplyDelete