With this week’s
readings, we get snapshots of different ways in which scholars have attempted
to integrate consumer/fan affect and response into a more synoptic view of the
ways in which new (i.e. in this instance, domestically-accessible) media serves
as an industrial structure, an aesthetic medium, and a system of communicative
signs. Jenkins provides the more optimistic approach, using de Certeau’s idea
of literary ‘poaching’ to coordinate fan response with an ideal of ethno-socio-sexual
plurality. Andrejevic, while not representative of the most extreme form of opposition
to the Jenkins-ites, still lands apart from such idealism, reading
participatory culture as a form of market-driven, alienated labor. Seiter’s
piece appeals to strict ethnographic method as a means of understanding how these
possibilities might show up, in manifest or latent forms, in the intellects and
languages of the fans themselves.
In Jenkins’s sense
of fandom, I don’t really consider myself to be a fan of anything, and I
certainly don’t see fandom of massive IPs like the MCU or Doctor Who as
contributing to a consistently radical politics. Also, like Jesse, I simply do
not buy Andrejevic and company’s insistence on the fundamental subservience of
fans and their actions to market logics. Any critical, evaluative, or
affective response to a media product can be taken up once more and
integrated into further output for consumption. One might effectively argue
that fan cultures—their remixes and rewritings—can more easily be
subsumed by media industries than, say, Mulvey’s critique of classical
Hollywood, but this merely signifies a difference in degree and not in kind. On
that basis, we would have to deny all aesthetic and political
formulations that engage in any way with recognizable images, tropes, and
narratives; we would be forced back into high modernism for the hope of any
sort of media which might amply criticize the institutions opposed. This, of
course, runs into the issue of democratized media/art. How can the ‘average’
person, the person without the privilege of a certain degree of cultural
capital, recognize themselves and their problems in mere abstractions?
Ultimately, I find fan engagement to be a legitimate source for the individual’s
acceptance of their pre-given position within a particular cultural matrix and
for the uptake of their hermeneutical role within it—their duty to refashion
aesthetic and communicative sense in terms of their lived experience as a
process of world-building and knowledge-seeking.
No comments:
Post a Comment