It goes without saying that Ellen is brilliant, but I really
enjoyed reading a piece that gets down to the brass tacks of methodology in
such a clear, understandable way. Audience
studies, thusfar, have not been a huge part of my research; I tend to look at
things historically and try to make sense of what people said in the limited
sources available to me. The sort of
strenuous, interview-based qualitative approaches that Ellen discusses in this
piece are fairly foreign to me, so it was great to have the pros, cons, and
complications laid out. Even having
Stuart Hall's encoding-decoding model describes so perfectly is a wonderful
resource to have in print!
Ellen's piece has encouraged me to think about how I can incorporate
some of her approaches in my work.
Particularly, the question "What is the best way to get people to
talk about the meanings they derive from television programmes when they may be
unaccustomed to interpreting TV material explicitly" (461) is a reminder
to not extrapolate out own subjective, myopic theoretical ideas. That is, at least for me, a constant
concern. How everyday audiences make
meaning should be at the core of our work, but producing "a holistic
description of a culture" (462) seems impossible. Especially, as in my case, when the project
is historical. We are brought back to
that boondoggle of what "culture" is and to whom it is relevant.
Of particular relevance to this class is the evolution of
reception models. Anything more nuanced
than the hypodermic model is a welcome improvement, but if the alternatives are
the uses and gratifications-style approaches that emphasize "active engagement
and the ways the media could be employed by individuals to satisfy needs and
accomplish personal goals," (462) I worry that (to steal a phrase from
neopagnism) we get too "love and light" for our own good. It is, admittedly, a fear I circle when I read
Henry Jenkins. Ellen balances this with
a lot of theory that I think counters being too hopeful about communication,
but I would love to hear from folks who do more with audiences.
No comments:
Post a Comment