The use of "convergence," especially in the
Jenkins piece, makes me very nervous. It
is undeniable that American media enterprises have rapidly consolidated
ownership, but Jenkins' tone (and that of other scholars) seems to transform
that historical trajectory into an inevitable force of nature that we may only
try to weather. Activism is oddly
foreclosed; the evenness of convergence is of more concern than resistance. The hopeful(?) prediction that
"innovation will occur on the fringes; consolidation in the mainstream"
is just as much a history of capitalism than a vision of the future. "Name-calling" is hardly the worst
horror of that history.
Similarly, I do not see anything speculative about the idea
of a world where "through media concentration...any message gains
authority simply by being broadcast on network television." That has been the state of communications
media as long as it has existed. I would
even go so far as to question if the
period at which Jenkins was writing was when that started to unravel, as
demonstrated through the British telefilm Ghostwatch
(1992), the smash-hit The Blair Witch
Project (1999) and its sequel, and the post-Paranormal Activity (2007) found footage boom. All of those directly confront the
reality/fiction distinction and the authority of media, while their
predecessors were more concerned with journalistic ethics and imperialism (Cannibal Holocaust, 1980) or the very
authority of television itself (Special
Bulletin, 1983; Countdown to Looking
Glass, 1984; Without Warning,
1994). In the wake of Trump, it is a
cultural assumption for many that the media is not authoritative.
Frankly, I am horrified by the idea of replacing resistance
with blogging. The mention of Howard Dean could be
definitive proof that such technowhimsy is unfounded, though an alternate
reading could be that Bernie was the actual fulfillment of prophesy. Some prophesy. My concern is probably best channeled into a
question that is just tangent to Jenkins.
How much does any of this
materially affect the lives of working people? New illusions of "engagement" based
on mediated resistance and acceptance of corporate oligarchy is only a
superficial "change." The
average person is never going to be empowered under capitalism, and corporate
blogging are not going to help that.
No comments:
Post a Comment