Foucault is everywhere… even the bathrooms!
Susan Fraiman’s fresh take on on-screen bathrooms as women’s space
dominated by the male gaze, functioning as yet another institution serving the patriarchal
power, and contemporary television’s recuperative movement to take back the
bathroom space that she termed “bathroom realism” was absolutely inspiring.
Fraiman’s analysis of the bathroom scenes in Broad City, Insecure, and
Girls stimulated much discussion
among those there, especially in regards to how the on-screen bathroom has
always been a Foucauldian institution that normalized white, male, heterosexuality.
Expanding further on Fraiman’s examination of how the uneroticized, “realistically
gross” female bodies as well as Black female bodies take on disruptive function
in the Foucaldian bathroom spaces in the aforementioned three shows, I wanted
to take on how queer bodies in bathroom spaces have been treated in popular
television, as well as how bathroom spaces (or the absence of one) in other
cultures have been portrayed in media texts as functioning points of
surveillance and regulation of the female body as topic for this week’s core
response post.
The above scene from Queer
as Folk is not the bathroom sex scene that I intended to show (I could not
find the one I needed uploaded online), but it demonstrates how public restrooms
are presented in popular culture as a focal point of gay sexuality. The
specific scene from QAF that I delved
into was from the fifth episode of the first season: when Justin’s mother finds
out that Justin is gay, and she decides to talk to Justin about his closeted sexuality
in a museum setting. However, once there, Justin decides to have spontaneous
sex with a stranger in the museum bathroom, leaving his mother sitting alone in
front of an enormous modernist painting, a trail of tears rolling down her face
as she waits for her son to come out of the stall. Even before George Michael
was found and publicly outed as gay by an undercover cop who arrested him for
engaging in “lewd” public sexual act, the public restroom space served a particular
role in surveilling the gays. Denied private space to perform their sexuality,
gay men were relegated to the ‘safest’ place they could perform coitus, which
was the public restroom – but this ‘haven’ for sexual liberation never could
serve that role, positioned on a narrow precipice between the private and the
public domain. Though erotically charged, the public bathroom becomes yet
another ‘locker room’ for gay men, where homophobic violence and surveillance
can be readily executed to the sexually deviant by the heterosexual man sharing
that space. In the particular scene from QAF
S1E5, the bathroom space is presented as such secret-but-not-so-secret
space for sexual deviance of the gay man, but at the same time, it is juxtaposed
to the close-up pan of Justin’s mother clearly in distress, serving as a
reminder of how the sexually deviant gay man’s liberation double-edges as a wedge
into the ‘ideal’, heteronormative family unit.
Another example I thought of was an Indian film released in
2017 titled Toilet: Ek Prem Katha, or
Toilet: A Love Story whose story, as
the title implies, revolves around a toilet that is denied to a young bride
married to a man, who finds out once she moves in with his family. While
Fraiman’s lecture focused on the contested ownership of the restroom space, it
is clear with Toilet: Ek Prem Katha that
a toilet itself can be a luxury for women beyond the American context. Mentioned
by Fraiman as background to her research, the lack of a toilet for Indian women
in the home as it is considered ‘unclean’ mirrors the pre-mid-1800s’ trend of
installing exclusive bathroom spaces reserved solely for men, denying women
access to similar facilities. NPR observes
in its article A Toilet Is The Star Of
India's Hit Rom-Com how the film reflects the politics surrounding the
toilet for women in Indian society, how the male-centric structuring of infrastructures
and lack of space for “bathroom realism” in the cultural space denies women
even the space to relieve themselves, also exposing women at higher risks of sexual
violence and natural hazards during open defecation. Though more on the nose
than the scenes Susan Fraiman discussed in her lecture, it is easy to observe
how institutionalized and politically charged a space even like the restroom is,
and how those deviant from the patriarchal norm must constantly fight for, on
screen and off screen, their place on the toilet.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI am also very interested in how cinema/TV portrays queer body in bathrooms! An example that immediately comes to my mind is Tsai Ming-liang’s Goodbye Dragon Inn (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4JxILL0CqE). In this 3-minute shot, three man stand still in front of the urinals for a time that is obviously too long for any normal people. In the background, a man walks out of a cubicle and then the door is shut again by another man from the inside. Without a single dialogue, this scene reflects the queer dynamics in public bathrooms, which was unspeakable in Taiwan in the 1960s (the time period that the film depicts). In Vive L'Amour (1994), Tsai Ming-liang uses the private bathroom as a place where the protagonist, Hsiao-kang, can free himself and try cross dressing. I don't know what to make of the examples, but the contrast between public and private bathrooms, as portrayed in Tsaing Ming-liang's movies, might be a good point for further thinking.
ReplyDelete